%20(2).png)
Most MSPs don’t wake up irrelevant. They arrive there slowly—through well-intentioned execution layered on top of outdated assumptions. The danger isn’t stagnation; it’s momentum without reflection. When teams stay busy but stop re-evaluating who they serve, how they win, and why clients still choose them, relevance quietly decays. This episode examines why MSP leaders must periodically step out of delivery mode and re-anchor around positioning, judgment, and a shared operating system like Vision to prevent drift from becoming structural.
From the trenches, Ray Stasieczko reinforces a hard truth: relevance is not preserved by effort alone. It’s preserved by clarity. Without explicit decisions about market focus, client fit, and internal accountability, MSPs mistake activity for progress and resilience for strategy. The cost shows up later—as margin compression, talent fatigue, and a business that looks successful on the surface but struggles to compound enterprise value over time.
Relevance loss rarely comes from a single bad decision. It emerges when leadership stops asking uncomfortable questions about fit, focus, and differentiation.
Growth can be deceptive. MSPs can add revenue while simultaneously weakening their long-term posture.
Admitting drift feels like admitting failure—but ignoring it is far more expensive. Relevance requires naming what no longer works.
Sustainable relevance is enforced through cadence, measurement, and shared language—not instinct. Operating systems make drift visible before it’s fatal.
It describes a slow form of strategic drift where MSPs remain busy and profitable in the short term but lose clarity around positioning, ideal clients, and long-term differentiation. The business keeps moving, but no longer in a deliberate direction.
Common signals include margin compression despite revenue growth, increasing service complexity, difficulty explaining why clients choose them, leadership fatigue, and teams executing well without clear strategic alignment.
Effort improves execution, not direction. Without periodic strategic judgment—about who to serve, what to say no to, and how to win—hard work can accelerate drift instead of correcting it.
Leadership is responsible for creating clarity and enforcing focus. When leaders avoid uncomfortable conversations about fit, accountability, or positioning, the organization defaults to inertia.
A shared operating system makes assumptions explicit, ties roles to outcomes, and forces regular visibility into priorities. This prevents relevance from being based on intuition alone and turns it into something measurable and defensible.
If this episode surfaced uncomfortable questions about relevance, that’s the point. The earlier you confront drift, the cheaper it is to correct.
%20(1).png)
5 min read
Josh Peterson : Nov 4, 2025 1:00:00 PM
In this episode of From the Trenches on the BMK Vision Podcast, Josh Peterson sits down with William Oppenheimer, CEO of Enveloc, Inc., for a...
-1.png)
3 min read
Josh Peterson : Dec 16, 2025 11:59:59 PM
In this episode of From the Trenches on the BMK Vision Podcast, Josh Peterson sits down with Jason Robinson of Integritech for a thoughtful...
.png)
4 min read
Josh Peterson : Jan 12, 2026 12:00:00 AM
Most MSPs treat innovation as overhead—payroll burned in the name of “better delivery”—instead of an asset that can be measured, defended, and...
Josh Peterson