5 min read
#49 – From the Trenches: Cold Calls & the Financial Wake Up (Alan Moon - Integritech)
In this episode of From the Trenches on the BMK Vision Podcast, Josh Peterson sits down with Alan Moon (co-founder of Integritech in Northwest...
5 min read
Josh Peterson
:
Nov 30, 2025 12:00:00 AM
In this episode of From the Trenches on the BMK Vision Podcast, Josh Peterson sits down with Michael Millhouse (President and Co-Founder of BridgePoint Technologies in the Chicago suburbs) for a grounded conversation about what it really takes to build—and stabilize—a $3–$5M MSP. Michael’s story isn’t framed as a “marketing breakthrough.” It’s framed as the hard, practical leadership work that shows up once the business is big enough to strain your old habits, but not yet structured enough to make growth feel controllable.
What makes this conversation useful is that it names the real constraint in the $3M–$5M band: you don’t scale through it by working harder—you scale by building a system that can carry the load without the owner acting as the operating system. That means role separation at the top (sales, service delivery, finance/admin), a deliberate client engagement motion that produces forward-looking initiatives, and a willingness to stop being “the guy” for every relationship. The punchline is simple: clients don’t pay for your heroics—they pay for reliability, and reliability only exists when the business has structure.
If you’re an MSP owner who feels busy but not in control—especially if recurring revenue is growing while margin clarity feels murky—this episode will resonate. And if your client engagement still relies on technical leaders “checking in” instead of a repeatable expansion motion, pair this conversation with BMK’s guide to client engagement strategy from onboarding to QBRs. For an advisory system that connects execution discipline to leadership cadence, explore Vision. And if you’re actively scaling through this stage, BMK’s work with MSPs in the $3–15M+ revenue range maps directly to the challenges Michael describes.
Short answer: because your old operating model still “works,” but it no longer scales—and the business starts charging you interest on every inconsistency.
Michael describes the whiplash MSP owners feel in this band: you gain ground, slide back, get frustrated, and wonder whether the business is actually improving or just getting bigger. It’s not that growth becomes impossible. It’s that growth becomes expensive when execution discipline hasn’t caught up to revenue.
Many MSPs hit a confusing stage: revenue climbs, the team works nonstop, and the owner still can’t explain why the business feels unstable—or why profitability doesn’t feel as real as it should.
This episode addresses three common growth constraints that show up right as an MSP starts to mature:
The takeaway is simple: the moment you want predictability, you need structure—roles, rhythms, and standards that keep the business consistent even when people are busy.
Short answer: scale requires clear ownership across sales, service delivery, and finance/admin—especially when there are multiple partners.
Josh and Michael reinforce a pattern BMK sees constantly: when owners “all do a version of everything,” the business looks collaborative but operates like chaos. Clear lanes reduce founder bottlenecks, stop internal overlap, and create the accountability needed to build a leadership layer beneath the owners.
Short answer: treat Customer Success Managers as revenue-generating account managers—and turn QBRs into Strategic Business Reviews that govern the future.
Michael explains how BridgePoint used CSMs to create consistent client touchpoints and expansion motion. The key shift is philosophical: the meeting is not a recap of tickets. It’s a forward-looking alignment conversation—security posture, modernization, cloud initiatives, and the next set of business-aligned recommendations.
Short answer: you can’t manage margin with blurry categories—and you can’t trust margin if execution data is undisciplined.
Michael is candid about a reality most MSPs face: charts of accounts often exist for tax convenience, not for operating decisions. In the $3–$5M band, that stops working. When you’re running multiple lines of business (managed services, SaaS, custom development), you need clean structure—otherwise you end up arguing with the P&L because it can’t explain the story.
Short answer: because partners rarely hold each other accountable consistently—and execution degrades without an external cadence keeper.
One of the most valuable threads in the episode is Michael’s experience moving from attempted self-implementation to working with a professional EOS facilitator. The change is subtle but decisive: commitments stop being optional, quarterly priorities become real, and communication improves across the organization because everyone can finally see where the company is going.
If you want to turn the lessons from this episode into execution, here’s a simple checklist to work through:
These aren’t growth hacks. They are governance disciplines—the kind that make growth sustainable instead of exhausting.
Michael Millhouse is the Co-Founder and President of BridgePoint Technologies, an MSP based in the Chicago suburbs that provides managed and co-managed IT services, cybersecurity, cloud solutions, and IT strategy. Michael’s leadership perspective is rooted in a rare combination: technical beginnings, sales and account management maturity, and the operational discipline required to build a business that can scale beyond the owner’s calendar.
Connect with Michael on LinkedIn →
What typically breaks in an MSP between $3M and $5M?
Role clarity and execution cadence. The business outgrows informal habits, and inconsistencies in service governance, accountability, and client engagement become expensive.
Are Customer Success Managers worth it for a growing MSP?
Yes—when the role is treated as a measurable account management function that drives retention and expansion, not as a vague “client happiness” role.
What’s the difference between a QBR and a Strategic Business Review (SBR)?
QBRs often look backward. SBRs align forward: business goals, risk posture, initiatives, and the next sequence of work that produces outcomes.
Why does EOS fail when MSPs try to self-implement?
Because accountability weakens without an external facilitator. Meetings drift, commitments become optional, and the cadence turns into activity instead of execution.
Why do MSP financials feel unclear even when revenue is up?
Because categorization and segmentation are often built for tax reporting, not operational decisions. Without clean structure, you can’t reliably see where margin is created—or lost.
How do I stop being “the guy” without losing client loyalty?
Build a repeatable account management motion, introduce it intentionally, and stay present strategically (not reactively). Clients don’t need the owner—they need consistency.
If you’re building through the $3M–$5M ceiling and want help connecting leadership lanes, client engagement, and execution discipline to financial clarity, explore Vision or apply to be a guest on the podcast.
👉 Apply to be on the BMK Vision Podcast
👉 Learn more about Vision
Return to the BMK Vision Podcast main page →
5 min read
In this episode of From the Trenches on the BMK Vision Podcast, Josh Peterson sits down with Alan Moon (co-founder of Integritech in Northwest...
5 min read
In this episode of From the Trenches on the BMK Vision Podcast, Josh Peterson sits down with Corey Kirkendoll—an enterprise-trained MSP operator who...
4 min read
In this episode of From the Trenches on the BMK Vision Podcast, Josh Peterson sits down with Luis Alvarez of Alvarez Technology Group for a grounded...